With the extraordinary increase in the quantity of sexual offenders who are also repeat sexual offenders the government decided to implement laws and regulations mandating convicted sex offenders to register with the states in which they live. While this measure is controversial, officials are contending it is an useful method of preventing recidivism in a number of of the more serious criminals. Are these laws an invasion of the defendant’s privacy the states and the politicians have forced upon someone that has served his sentence, or is this a legitimate measure of control for some of society’s most risky offenders?
Somewhere in time, it became okay for the authorities to track former criminals by mandating that they register as an offender, they’re for all intents and purposes monitoring the criminal. The government does nothing more than closely monitor the sex offender’s whereabouts, actions, friends, lifestyle, etc. How these laws came into being is quite scary, while it has occurred for a crime that fits the punishment, it also come with a price. A lot of individuals view this as a severe invasion of an individual’s right to privacy and human rights. In The Union pursuant to the European Convention on Human Rights, such practices would almost certainly not be allowed.
Since laws were enacted requiring sexual to register in their state of residence, it has paved the way for individuals convicted of other crimes to be mandated to register. Once that takes places it allows the governments to start requiring that all individuals be registered for one reason or another. Is this something that the people are willing to let happen? Should the state or federal governments have full knowledge of where you go, the identity of your friends and where you are employed?
On the opposite end of the spectrum, many believe that the laws regarding sex offenders are not enough; they believe that there should be much stricter punishments and heavier penalties for these crimes. There are various motivations among the individuals and groups seeking to increase the severity of the punishments for sex offenses. Some individuals are primarily motivated by a desire for revenge while some genuinely believe that strict and rigid punishments are required to protect our children.
The primary goal of the registration laws is to protect the wellbeing of children. Nevertheless, as a society, we must ask ourself, how far is too far? It has been suggested implanting the offenders with a microchip thus enabling law enforcement agencies to constantly watch the offender’s movements. Is this type of surveillance something the public will accept?
What is the possibility of this type of registration being implemented for other crimes? Is there a purpose to releasing an individual from prison if that person is so dangerous that he has to be continuously tracked? The requirement for registration can cause social problems & victimize the offenders that have shown themselves to be a continuing danger to society.
How do you think it should be handled? There are some individuals who truly believe that the registration statutes ought to be abolished, that once an individual serves his time the individual should be permitted to reenter society and be free to live his live free from public scrutiny.
For more information concerning Criminal Defense Lawyer Fort Lauderdale, Dui Attorney Fort Lauderdale please contact us at: The Law Offices of Rosenberg and Dye 1 E Broward Blvd
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954)990-0525